Saldivar-Vargas

United States v. Saldivar-Vargas

Good Law
273 F. Supp. 2d 1130·2003 WL 21638235·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18398
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 200302CR3303California4,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rhoades, J.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

I. Introduction

Defendant Joel Saldivar-Vargas (“defendant”) is charged in a one-count indictment with being an alien found in the United States after previously being “excluded, deported and removed” in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Defendant moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that his prior removal proceeding may not be used to demonstrate that he was previously removed due to the immigration judge’s failure to inform him of, and to allow him to apply for, certain relief. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

II. Background

Defendant, a citizen of Mexico, was granted legal permanent resident status on December 1, 1990. On April 7, 1994, defendant pleaded guilty to rape by a foreign object. He served 365 days, or one year, in county jail. Under the immigration laws then in effect, defendant was not deportable or removable.

After his conviction, Congress made sweeping changes to the immigration laws by passage of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), P.L. 104-132, and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”), P.L. 104-208. As will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.