In Re Remec Incorporated Securities Litigation

Good Law
415 F. Supp. 2d 1106·2006 WL 399147·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8657
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 200604CV1948 JM(AJB)California5,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

Defendants Remec, Inc., Ronald E. Rag-land, and Winston E. Hickman move to dismiss Plaintiffs second amended federal securities complaint (“SAC”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is granted with 20 days leave to amend from the date of entry of this order.

BACKGROUND

Lead Plaintiff, the Cuvelier Group, alleges that Defendants Remec, Inc. (“Remec”), its CEO Ronald E. Ragland (“Rag-land”), and its CFO Winston E. Hickman (“Hickman”) violated the federal securities laws by issuing a series of knowingly false statements concerning Remec’s financial condition during the Class Period of September 8, 2003 through September 8, 2004.

Remec is a designer and manufacturer of high frequency subsystems used to transmit voice, video and other data over wireless communications networks and in space and national defense applications. (SAC ¶ 2). The Class Period begins on September 8, 2003 when Remec announced its second fiscal quarter 2004 financial results, for the period ending August 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.