Contreras

Contreras v. Rice

Good Law
5 F. Supp. 2d 854·1998 WL 264233·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7633
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 7, 1998CV 97-2120-JGD(RC)California9,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that'the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on petitioner and counsel for respondents.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON A STATE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable John G. Davies, United States District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

BACKGROUND

I

On January 23, 1992, in the Los Angeles County Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.