Kortan

Kortan v. State of Cal.

Good Law
5 F. Supp. 2d 843·1998 WL 236216·83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 611·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6643
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 7, 1998CV 96-8518-ERCalifornia5,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rafeedie, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On April 6, 1998, defendant State of California’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment came on for hearing before the Honorable Edward Rafeedie in Courtroom 1. The Court has read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and, having considered the oral argument of counsel, now HEREBY GRANTS the motion in its entirety for the reasons set forth below.

I. Background

Plaintiff Aybike Kortan’s Second Amended Complaint raises four causes of action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et Seq.: racial harassment under a hostile work environment theory, sexual harassment under a hostile work environment theory, disparate treatment because of gender, and retaliation.

Kortan is a Caucasian female whose former employer is the State of California Department of Youth Authority (hereinafter Youth Authority). Kortan was employed by the Youth Authority as a clinical psychologist from 1988 to October 1994; it appears from the record that she is currently on disability leave.

During Kortan’s tenure at the Youth Authority, she served, from time to time, as the “acting senior psychologist” during her im…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.