Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Superior Court

Good Law
507 F. Supp. 2d 1082·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64870
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2007C-07-01876 PJH (JCS)California6,571 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spero, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH STATE COURT SUBPOENAS AND VACATE STATE COURT ORDER [Docket No. 9]

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioners Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), FBI Special Agent Joan Li-nehan, and Assistant United States Attorney (“AUSA”) Kim bring a “Motion to Quash State Court Subpeona and Vacate State Court Order; or, Alternatively, for Leave of Court to Bring Such Motion” (the “Motion”), seeking to quash two state court subpoenas compelling Agent Linehan to testify and to vacate a state court order compelling Agent Linehan to testify and both Agent Linehan and AUSA Kim to produce information. Petitioners assert that, in the current procedural posture, the state court was without jurisdiction to enforce process against these employees of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) because of: 1) the lack of authorization from the DOJ to provide the requested information as required by the applicable Department disclosure regulations; and 2) the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Motion came on for hearing on Friday, August 10, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. Melanie Proctor appeared on behalf of the Petitioners, Jon P. Rankin appeared on behalf of Mario Hammonds, and Jack Ryder appeared on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.