State of California v. United States District Court in and for Southern District of California United States v. United States District Court in and for Southern District of California, Northern Division Chowchilla Water Dist. v. United States District Court in and for Southern District of California

Good Law
213 F.2d 818·1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3577
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 195414284California4,723 words

Opinion

Opinion

213 F.2d 818 STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al. UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, NORTHERN DIVISION et al. CHOWCHILLA WATER DIST. et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al. No. 14243. No. 14244. No. 14284. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 3, 1954. No. 14243: Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., of California, B. Abbott Goldberg, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California, for petitioner. Claude L. Rowe, Fresno, Cal., for real parties in interest herein. J. E. Simpson, Fred Horowitz, William H. Nichols, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Robert H. Mullen, City Atty., Lodi, Cal., F. A. Silviera, City Atty., Merced, Cal., William Biddick, Jr., City Atty., Stockton, Cal., Allen Grimes, City Atty., Modesto, Cal., amici curiae. No. 14244: Herbert Brownell, Jr., Atty. Gen., J. Lee Rankin, Asst. Atty. Gen., William H. Veeder, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for petitioner. Claude L. Rowe, Fresno, Cal., for real parties in interest herein. J. E. Simpson, Fred Horowitz, William H. Nichols, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Robert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.