State of California v. United States District Court in and for Southern District of California United States v. United States District Court in and for Southern District of California, Northern Division Chowchilla Water Dist. v. United States District Court in and for Southern District of California
Opinion
Opinion
213 F.2d 818 STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al. UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, NORTHERN DIVISION et al. CHOWCHILLA WATER DIST. et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al. No. 14243. No. 14244. No. 14284. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 3, 1954. No. 14243: Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., of California, B. Abbott Goldberg, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California, for petitioner. Claude L. Rowe, Fresno, Cal., for real parties in interest herein. J. E. Simpson, Fred Horowitz, William H. Nichols, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Robert H. Mullen, City Atty., Lodi, Cal., F. A. Silviera, City Atty., Merced, Cal., William Biddick, Jr., City Atty., Stockton, Cal., Allen Grimes, City Atty., Modesto, Cal., amici curiae. No. 14244: Herbert Brownell, Jr., Atty. Gen., J. Lee Rankin, Asst. Atty. Gen., William H. Veeder, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for petitioner. Claude L. Rowe, Fresno, Cal., for real parties in interest herein. J. E. Simpson, Fred Horowitz, William H. Nichols, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Robert…