Hawkins

Hawkins v. Baca

Good Law
114 F. Supp. 2d 987·2000 WL 1449842·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16507
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2000CV 00-01078 DDP CWXCalifornia2,420 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT YAROSLAVSKY’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs first amended complaint filed by defendants Yaroslavsky, Antonovich, Burke, Knabe, and Molina. These five defendants are members of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court adopts the following order.

BACKGROUND

This motion arises out of a complaint filed by Ronnie C. Hawkins against Los Angeles County Sheriff Le Roy Baca, five deputy sheriffs, fifty unknown sheriffs department employees (“Unknown Named Defendants”), and the five members of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (the “Supervisors”). This particular motion to dismiss is brought by the Supervisors only.

According to the complaint, the relevant facts are as follows. At the time of the incident giving rise to this complaint, Hawkins was a pretrial detainee in the custody of the defendants at the Los Angeles County Men’s Central Jail. (First Amended Compl. ¶ 10.) In addition to representing himself in a criminal action, he was also a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.