Edwards

Edwards v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.

Good Law
716 F. Supp. 438·1989 WL 73936·1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7661
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 1989C-89-0551 WHOCalifornia2,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

Orrick, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Harry Edwards, brought this suit against defendants The Pulitzer Publishing Company (“Pulitzer”), William F. Woo, and Tom Wheatley, alleging deceit, invasion of privacy, appropriation of name, and interference with prospective advantage. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The Court finds it has personal jurisdiction over defendants and denies defendants’ motion to dismiss.

I.

Edwards is an associate professor of sociology at the University of California at Berkeley where he is well known for his work in professional sports. He is and was a resident of California during all times pertinent to the allegations in the complaint.

Pulitzer is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. It owns and publishes the St. Louis Post-Dispatch (“Post-Dispatch”). Neither the paper nor the corporation itself have offices for conducting business in California and neither is registered nor qualified to do business in California. The Post-Dispatch does not solicit subscribers in California, but does have a small circulation in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.