In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership Lit.

In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership Litigation

Good Law
223 F. Supp. 2d 1142·2002 WL 31027490·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18052
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2002CV 98-7035DDPAJWxCalifornia4,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER DENYING DEPENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the Corrected Second Restated, Amended and Supplemental Complaint (the “CSRASC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(c) and 9(b), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act” or the “PSLRA”). After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties, and hearing oral argument, the Court adopts the following order.

I. Background

Please see the Court’s Order Denying the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment for a detailed background of this action.

II. Discussion

A. Legal Standard

Judgment on the pleadings is properly granted when, taking all the allegations as true, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 189 F.3d 971 , 979 (9th Cir.1999).

B. Analysis

1. Compliance with Court’s July 20, 2001 Order

The defendants assert that the plaintiffs have failed to comply with the Court’s prior Order by failing to reduce the length . of their complaint. The CSRASC contains 138 pages, plus a 19-page…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.