Vieux

Vieux v. County of Alameda

Good Law
695 F. Supp. 1023·1987 WL 48843·1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13995
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 1987C-85-3394 WHOCalifornia4,602 words

Opinion

Opinion

Orrick, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

The major question considered in this action is whether plaintiff landowners become entitled to reversionary land interests in abandoned railroad rights-of-way. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that they do not.

I

Plaintiffs are twenty-one landowners, or executors or trustees of landowners, challenging the transfer by Southern Pacific Transportation Company (“Southern Pacific”) to the County of Alameda (the “County”) of certain railroad rights-of-way located in two separate areas known as Niles Canyon Road (9.7 miles long) and the Altamont Pass (11 miles long), both within the County. They represent the overwhelming majority of all owners of land adjoining or underlying the rights-of-way in those two areas.

Defendants include the County, Southern Pacific, Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation (“Santa Fe”), and County Supervisors Robert T. Knox and John George (“Supervisors”).

Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint alleges violations of the federal Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (1981), the Public Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. § 912 (1986), and the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (1962). The complaint seeks damages under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.