Barker

Barker v. Southern Pac. Co.

Good Law
214 F.2d 918·34 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2691·1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4052
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 195413609California560 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bone, J.

Appellant appeals from an order of the lower court granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The suit is for damages for an alleged wrongful discharge of appellant, a dining car waiter employed by appellee under a collective bargaining agreement between appellee and certain Locals of the Dining Car, Cooks and Waiters Union.

The aforesaid agreement provides, in part:

It is undisputed that appellant failed to file the “written request” required by the above quoted rule within ten days of his notice of dismissal. The issues involved in this appeal concern the necessity of so filing, and of exhausting all remedies under the contract, and administrative remedies thereunder prior to bringing suit. The reasonableness of a period as short as ten days is also questioned, but in this case appellant was not required to prepare a complaint, but merely to file a request for a hearing. That would be an ordinarily probable act which would normally occur quite promptly after the notice of discharge even without any time limitation. We see no circumstances which make the ten day period unreasonable in this case.

The failure to givé*notice in ten…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.