United States v. Midway Heights County Water District

Good Law
695 F. Supp. 1072·1988 WL 100035·19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20142·27 ERC (BNA) 2185·1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10928
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 1988Civ. S-87-1112-RAR/EMCalifornia2,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

King, J.

ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

This matter came before the court on plaintiff’s Motion for Amendment of this Court’s Order of February 26, 1988. Plaintiff seeks an amendment of that Order to include findings of fact and conclusions of law. Although the court waited to issue this order until defendant had the opportunity to respond, defendant’s own Motion to Amend offered in opposition to plaintiff’s motion merely reiterates points which the court has already heard and rejected. Therefore, based upon the entire record in this case, including the submitted briefs of counsel, the supporting declarations, and counsels’ oral argument before the Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Amendment of this Court’s Order of February 26,1988 be, and the same hereby is GRANTED, and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

I. This court’s Order of February 26, 1988 shall be amended by insertion of the following language between page 2, line 3, and page 2, line 4, i.e., between “oral argument” and “IT IS HEREBY ORDERED”:

THIS COURT HEREBY FINDS AND CONCLUDES:

1. Jurisdiction exists over the parties, and over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.