Rutherford

Rutherford v. Pitchess

Bad Law
457 F. Supp. 104·1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16369
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 1978CV 75-4111-WPGCalifornia2,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gray, J.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

This action seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, on constitutional grounds under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , against certain practices and conditions of confinement at the Los Angeles County Central Jail (the “jail”). The court previously has established the plaintiff class as consisting of all prisoners in the jail since December 31, 1975. The court found that the class is so numerous that joinder is impracticable; that the questions of law and fact and the claims presented by the class representatives are common to the class; and that the outstandingly competent representation provided the named plaintiffs by Terry Smerling, Esq., of the ACLU Foundation ■ of Southern California, will adequately protect the interests of the class as a whole.

The defendants are the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, some of his subordinates that are concerned with the administration of the jail, and the members of the County Board of Supervisors.

Trial of this case involved about seventeen days of testimony, the receipt of many exhibits, and the submission of thoroughly prepared pre-trial and post-trial briefs. In addition, with the prior agreement of counsel, the court made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.