Blumenthal

STATE OF CAL. BY & THROUGH YOUNGER v. Blumenthal

Good Law
457 F. Supp. 1309
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 1978Civ. No. S-78-356-TJMCalifornia2,132 words

Opinion

Opinion

WILLIAM W SCHWARZER, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action on July 10, 1978, seeking broad declaratory and injunctive relief against the application of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 88 Stat. 829 , 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., to pension and retirement plans maintained by the State of California or any of its agencies. Plaintiff asserts that Congress did not intend the Act to apply to governmental plans, and that even if Congress intended otherwise, its application to such plans would violate the tenth amendment. ERISA requires, among other things, the filing of an annual information return by every employer maintaining a pension plan described in part I of subchapter D of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [1] An unexcused failure to file may result in penalties of $10 for each day during which the failure continues up to a maximum of $5,000. 26 U.S.C. § 6652 (f).

Plaintiff has moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant "from imposing . . . or threatening to impose a fine upon plaintiff . . . for plaintiff's refusal to file with defendant the return mentioned in Section 6058 . . ." Defendant takes the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.