Marovic

United States v. Marovic

Good Law
69 F. Supp. 2d 1190·1999 WL 969646·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16635
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1999C 97-3063 CRBCalifornia1,767 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Now before the Court are the motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of defendants Computer Sciences Corporation and Anteon Corporation. After carefully considering the papers submitted by the parties, and haying had the benefit of oral argument on October 8, 1999, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

This False Claims Act (“FCA”) action arises out of a subcontractor’s submission of invoices for work that was never performed. From 1990 through 1995, defendant Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”) had a contract with the General Services Administration- (“GSA”) to provide business-related automated data processing services • to federal agencies throughout the western United - States. GSA assigned work under the contract on a “task-order” basis. Upon the request of an agency, GSA would issue a task order specifying the services needed by a particular agency. Some of the task orders included work to be performed at the Naval Public Works Center (“PUC”). CSC subcontracted the PUC work to defendant Techo, Inc. (“Techo”). Techo’s CEO was defendant George Marovic. Techo, had been performing similar services for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.