National Labor Relations Board v. Daboll

216 F.2d 143 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Charles E. DABOLL, Jr., and Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, A.F.L., Local Union No. 797, Respondents. No. 14071. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. September 17, 1954. Rehearing Denied October 12, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc., Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Abraham Siegel, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Bonner & Rittenhouse, Las Vegas, Nevada, for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. 1 The National Labor Relations Board, after proceedings regularly had, found respondent Daboll and respondent Union guilty of unfair labor practices. Daboll is a plastering contractor who purchases lath and plaster, and recruits and supervises the workmen who do the plastering. During that part of 1952 preceding August 15th, the period during which the alleged unfair labor practices occurred, Daboll did work in California for which he was paid $27,484.42, and work in Nevada for which he was paid $323,000.00 The Board determined to…