National Labor Relations Board v. J. E. Mccatron

Good Law
216 F.2d 212·35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2012·1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3841
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 195414166_1California2,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

216 F.2d 212 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. J. E. McCATRON, R. F. Nine and M. M. Dinkel, Co-partners, d/b/a Price Valley Lumber Co., and J. E. McCatron, R. F. Nine, Loren Weeks and Lloyd Urquarht, Co-partners, d/b/a Idaho Pine Moulding Co., Respondents. No. 14166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 13, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Thomas R. Haley and Frederick Reel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondents. Before BONE, ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges. 1 ORR Circuit Judge. 2 Price Valley Lumber Company and Idaho Pine Moulding Company are partnerships. Price Valley has its principal office in Tamarack, Idaho, and engages in the business of logging, and the operation of a sawmill and a planing mill. Idaho Pine is a small operation in which the major partners in Price Valley own a half interest. It was organized for the purpose of salvaging some profit from the 'edgings' which are a by-product of the Price Valley mill operations through the manufacture of mouldings. Idaho Pine operates in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.