Gilmore

Gilmore v. U.S. Department of Energy

Good Law
153 A.L.R. Fed. 759·4 F. Supp. 2d 912·1998 WL 220084·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6252
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 1998C-95-0285 WHOCalifornia7,825 words

Opinion

Opinion

Orrick, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

In this action brought by John Gilmore (“Gilmore”) against the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 , both parties now move for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, DOE’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part, and denied in part. Gilmore’s motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety.

I.

On December 8, 1993, Gilmore filed a FOIA request with DOE, seeking access to all agency records pertaining to the CLER-VER conferencing technology. CLERVER was created by Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (“SNL”), is owned by San-dia Corporation (“Sandia”), and has been licensed to several private parties, including SunSolutions, Inc. (“Sun”). CLERVER is video conferencing software that allows people in different geographical locations to simultaneously collaborate on complex technical drawings and schematics using their desktop computers. Gilmore requested a copy of CLERVER, as well as all documentation relating to CLERVER, including the source code. He also requested all records that pertain to the rationale for making CLERVER available to Sun, but not to the general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.