Catellus Development Corp. v. United States

Good Law
828 F. Supp. 764·1993 WL 294548·37 ERC (BNA) 2058·1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10803
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 1993C-91-2531 EFLCalifornia5,437 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lynch, J.

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Catellus Development Corporation (“Catellus”) brought this suit pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 as Amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 (a)(2) and (3). Plaintiff seeks to recover response costs which it claims to have incurred in the investigation and remediation of its contaminated Point Isabel property in Richmond, California.

This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment by one defen dant, General Automotive, Ine. (“General”), and a cross-motion against General by plaintiff Catellus. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant General’s motion for summary judgment and deny the cross-motion by Catellus.

I. Factual Background

The material facts pertinent to this motion are, by plaintiffs own admission, undisputed. Catellus owns a parcel of property at Point Isabel in Richmond, California, which was contaminated by lead that leached into the soil and surrounding bay from crushed battery casings dumped at the property over the course of several years. In the mid-1980’s environmental regulators discovered elevated levels…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.