Keating

Keating v. National Union Fire Insurance

Bad Law
754 F. Supp. 1431·91 Daily Journal DAR 1156·1990 WL 257590·1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18006
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 1990CV 89-5343 SVW, CV 89-6799 SVWCalifornia4,784 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

REVISED ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs-counterdefendants in these consolidated actions (hereinafter “Keat-ing”) are directors and/or officers of Lincoln Savings and Loan Association (“Lincoln”) and/or American Continental Corporation (“ACC”). Each is currently named as a defendant in, among others, Sarah B. Shields, et al. v. Charles H. Keating, Jr., et al., (Central District of California case number CV 89-2052 SVW) and Yahr, et al. v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, et al., (Los Angeles County Superior Court case number NWC 51500). The plaintiffs in Shields and Yahr allege, inter alia, that the defendants therein perpetrated a scheme whereby corporate bonds of ACC were fraudulently sold to Lincoln customers. The fraud consisted of alleged misrepresentations that the bonds were backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government, when, in fact, they were not.

Defendant-counterclaimant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“National Union”) entered into a number of written contracts with ACC whereby National Union agreed to provide liability insurance for ACC. Policy GLA 9605142 provided primary liability insurance for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.