Frohnmayer

Bella Lewitzky Dance Foundation v. Frohnmayer

Good Law
754 F. Supp. 774·91 Daily Journal DAR 991·1991 WL 1649·1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 332
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 1991CV 90-3616 JGD, CV 90-5142 JGDCalifornia6,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davies, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On December 17, 1990, the Court heard oral argument on cross-motions for summary judgment in each of the above-captioned cases. The Court HEREBY GRANTS plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and DENIES defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

The cross-motions for summary judgment made in these two actions have been consolidated. In each case the named defendants are the National Endowment for the Arts (“NEA”), an independent agency of the United States and John E. Frohn-mayer, Chairperson of said agency. Bella Lewitzky Dance Foundation is the plaintiff in case CV 90-3616 JGD, and Newport Harbor Art Museum is the plaintiff in case CV 90-5142 JGD. Facts common to both eases abound as do common questions of law. For this reason, the Court has consolidated the two actions for these limited purposes pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a).

FACTS

The Parties

Plaintiff Bella Lewitzky Dance Foundation (“Foundation”) is a nonprofit corporation which does business as the Lewitzky Dance Company. The Foundation was incorporated in California in 1968. It creates and performs modern dance works throughout the United States and foreign…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.