National Labor Relations Board v. R. H. Osbrink

Good Law
218 F.2d 341
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 195514073California3,636 words

Opinion

Opinion

218 F.2d 341 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. R. H. OSBRINK, M. E. Osbrink and Berton W. Beals, as Trustee, co-partners, doing business under the firm name and style of R. H. Osbrink Manufacturing Company, Respondents. No. 14073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1954. Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1955. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C., George O'Brien, Los Angeles, Cal., Arnold Ordman, Margaret M. Farmer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, William F. Spalding, Frank M. Benedict, Nutter & Berger, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Before STEPHENS and FEE, Circuit Judges, and LING, District Judge. STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. 1 The National Labor Relations Board is before us petitioning for an order of enforcement in two separate though related proceedings which were consolidated for hearing before an examiner, and later before the board. One was a proceeding to set aside a representative election and the other was upon charges that respondent had discharged certain employees in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.