US Ex Rel. Cericola v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG.

Good Law
529 F. Supp. 2d 1139
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 2007CV 03-2294 GAF (VBKx)California5,364 words

Opinion

Opinion

Arthur R. Loevy, Jonathan I. Loevy, Mike Kanovitz, Loevy & Loevy, Chicago, IL, Brian P. McCafferty, Katherine B. Bornstein, Provost & Umphrey, Philadelphia, PA, Mark Allen Kleiman, Mark A. Kleiman. Law Offices, Santa Monica, CA, Frank D. Kortum, Assistant U.S. Attorney LA, Office of U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Dee Lord, Dodge Wells, Joyce R. Branda, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Relator.

Aaron Gregory Murphy, Daniel R. Seltzer, David J. Schindler, Terri Lea Lilley, Latham & Watkins, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge.

This is the second of two motions to dismiss brought by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"). On November 27, 2007, the Court denied Fannie Mae's motion to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint ("FAC") for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the present motion, Fannie Mae moves to dismiss the FAC for failure to plead fraud with particularity as required by Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fannie Mae…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.