Lucasey Manufacturing Corp. v. Anchor Pad International, Inc.

Good Law
698 F. Supp. 190·1988 WL 116310·7 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1811·1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12377
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 1988C-88-0088 SAWCalifornia1,962 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weigel, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

I. Background

Plaintiff Lucasey Manufacturing Corporation sues defendant Anchor Pad International for declaratory relief that plaintiff’s office equipment security devices do not infringe defendant’s U.S. Patent No. 3,850, -392 (the “ ’392” patent). Defendant has cross-claimed for a determination that the ’392 patent is valid and infringed by plaintiff’s product. Plaintiff has also alleged that defendant’s threats of litigation against and communications with plaintiff’s distributors and customers constitutes unfair competition.

Plaintiff now seeks a preliminary injunction against what it asserts are acts of unfair competition.

Defendant’s ’392 patent is for an equipment security device to prevent the ready theft of business machines such as typewriters and computers. The patent is restricted to devices that are adhesively secured to a supporting surface, rather than secured by nuts and bolts which require drilling. Plaintiff also produces office equipment security devices which it refers to as “glue down units.”

Defendant has contended since at least 1984 that plaintiff’s security devices infringe on the ’392 patent. Since that time, defendant has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.