Gunn

Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Good Law
407 F. Supp. 2d 1162·2006 WL 52717·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1432
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2006CV 04-01852 FMC MANXCalifornia1,117 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cooper, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (docket # 63). The Court has read and considered the moving, opposition, and reply documents submitted in connection with this Motion. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for January 9, 2006, is removed from the Court’s calendar.

In an order dated October 31, 2005, the Court, on administrative review, found that Plaintiff was entitled to benefits under the relevant ERISA plan after Defendant had terminated his benefits. Plaintiff now seeks an award of attorney fees.

In an ERISA action to recover unpaid disability benefits, “the court in its discretion may allow a reasonable attorney’s fee and costs of action to either party.” 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (g)(1). Where a beneficiary prevails in an ERISA suit for benefits, he “should ordinarily recover an attorney’s fee unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.” Smith v. CMTA-IAM Pension Trust, 746 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.1984) (internal quotations omitted). “As a general rule, ERISA employee plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.