Benjamin Davidson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
219 F.2d 147·46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1657·1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 5234
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 195513767_1California536 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Davidson petitions this court for review of a decision of the Tax Court sustaining a $388.05 deficiency assessed against him by respondent.

Petitioner’s wife secured an interlocutory decree of divorce from him. The property settlement agreement incorporated by the court in the decree provided in material part as follows:

Petitioner paid his wife the sum of $3,000.00 for the taxable year 1947 and claimed such sum as a deduction from his gross income. Respondent commissioner disallowed said $3,000.00 deduction on the ground that it did not constitute a proper deduction under § 23 (u) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Tax Court sustained respondent and petitioner appeals from that portion of the decision disallowing the sum of $1,-500.00 as a deduction for alimony payments of $125.00 per month to his wife, such payments not being for the support and maintenance of the minor children.

Petitioner claims the deduction pursuant to §§ 22(k) and 23(u) of the Internal Revenue Code, the pertinent provisions of which follow:

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the disputed payments made by petitioner in the taxable year 1947, were periodic payments, deductible by him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.