Townes
Townes v. Paule
Opinion
Opinion
Houston, J.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging defendants violated his constitutional rights. In lieu of an answer, defendants Brunner, Castillo and Paule (collectively “defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that plaintiff failed to comply with the exhaust requirement set forth by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1), the Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia, United States Magistrate Judge, submitted a report and recommendation (“report”) to this Court recommending defendants’ motion be granted. Objections to the report were due by September 30, 2005, but neither party filed objections. After careful consideration of the pleadings and relevant exhibits submitted by the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report in its entirety and GRANTS defendants’ motion in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
The instant complaint, filed on February 7, 2005, alleges that, on January 6, 2004, defendant Paule used…