Intel Corp. v. Hyundai Electronics America, Inc.

Good Law
692 F. Supp. 1113·1987 WL 47802
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1987C 87-20534 RPACalifornia2,002 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aguilar, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS

I. Introduction.

This is a case for patent infringement. Plaintiff Intel Corporation has moved to strike and/or to dismiss in part the answer filed by five of the eight defendants (the five defendants who are party to this motion are hereinafter referred to as the “defendants”). The Court grants in part and denies in part Intel’s motion.

II. Facts.

Plaintiff Intel filed suit against eight different defendants, alleging infringement of nine different patents. The patents involve Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory semiconductor chips (EPROMs). Intel has brought the present motion to strike and/or to dismiss parts of defendants’ answer and counterclaim. The five defendants who have joined in the answer and counterclaim and who are parties to the present motion are Hyundai Electronics America, Inc.; Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.; Cypress Electronics, Inc.; All-American Semiconductor, Inc.; and Pacesetter Electronics, Inc.

On August 5, 1987, Intel filed its complaint. The defendants involved in the present motion answered and counterclaimed on October 5, 1987. That answer included…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.