Murtishaw

People v. Murtishaw

Caution
121 Cal. Rptr. 3d 586·2011 Cal. LEXIS 1828·51 Cal. 4th 574·247 P.3d 941
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2011S110541California8,873 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moreno, J.

Capital defendant David Leslie Murtishaw comes before this court for the third time. “[In 1978 a] jury convicted [defendant] of three counts of first degree murder .... (Pen. Code, § 187; former § 217.)[ ] The jury also sustained one firearm-use allegation (§ 12022.5) and one multiple-murder special-circumstance allegation. (Former § 190.2, subd. (c)(5).) After a penalty trial, the jury set the penalty at death under the 1977 death penalty law. (See former § 190.1 et seq.; Stats. 1977, ch. 316, §§ 7-13, pp. 1257-1262.) This court affirmed the guilt and special circumstance findings but reversed the penalty judgment. (People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 ] (Murtishaw I).) After a penalty retrial, a jury once again determined that defendant should suffer the ultimate punishment.” (People v. Murtishaw (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1001, 1006-1007 [ 258 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 773 P.2d 172 ], fn. omitted (Murtishaw II).) In Murtishaw II, we “rejected] defendant’s attempt to reopen the validity of the guilt judgment [and found] no error at the second penalty trial which warranted] reversal of the verdict. We therefore affirm[ed] the judgment in full.” (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.