Walker

Walker v. Boeing Corp.

Good Law
218 F. Supp. 2d 1177·2002 WL 1768987·173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2787·18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1509·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16232
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 9, 2002CV 00-02557 WMB(SHx)California10,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

Byrne, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action, plaintiff Gary J. Walker alleges that his employer Douglas Aircraft Company (“DAC”), the predecessor in interest of defendant Boeing Company (“Boeing”), conspired with DAC’s parts vendor Neill Aircraft Company (“Neill Ar- craft”) to fabricate a sexual harassment pretext for his termination from DAC’s employ. Walker further alleges that his union, defendant International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”), breached its duty to protect his interests as against DAC. Walker asserts claims against Boeing and Neill Aircraft for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, conspiracy, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and defamation. Walker asserts two additional claims against Boeing for wrongful termination in violation of public policy and violation of the California Labor Code’s prohibition on misrepresenting a former employee’s record to other potential employers. Walker’s only claim against his union is for breach of the duty of fair representation.

Each of the three defendants now moves for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.