Knapps
Knapps v. City of Oakland
Opinion
Opinion
James, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ORDER THEREON
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the Court for claims arising out of an incident on August 10, 2004 between Plaintiff Uganda Knapps (“Plaintiff’) and Oakland Police Officers Michael Cardoza, Francisco Rojas and Sergeant James Kelly. On July 19, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging excessive force and malicious prosecution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , as well as supplemental state law claims for negligence, false ar rest/imprisonment, battery, and statutory claims for the violation of his rights under California Civil Code sections 51.7 and 52.1.
The parties waived a jury trial, and the case was tried before the Court on October 17, 23, and 24, 2007. After considering and weighing all the evidence and the parties’ arguments, and having assessed the credibility of the witnesses, the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).
II. FINDINGS OF FACT
As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that the trial in this case was largely about witness credibility, as the parties presented contradictory versions of the incident. For purposes of the…