Knapps

Knapps v. City of Oakland

Good Law
647 F. Supp. 2d 1129·2009 WL 2390262
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 200905-2935 MEJCalifornia22,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

James, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ORDER THEREON

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is before the Court for claims arising out of an incident on August 10, 2004 between Plaintiff Uganda Knapps (“Plaintiff’) and Oakland Police Officers Michael Cardoza, Francisco Rojas and Sergeant James Kelly. On July 19, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging excessive force and malicious prosecution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , as well as supplemental state law claims for negligence, false ar rest/imprisonment, battery, and statutory claims for the violation of his rights under California Civil Code sections 51.7 and 52.1.

The parties waived a jury trial, and the case was tried before the Court on October 17, 23, and 24, 2007. After considering and weighing all the evidence and the parties’ arguments, and having assessed the credibility of the witnesses, the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).

II. FINDINGS OF FACT

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that the trial in this case was largely about witness credibility, as the parties presented contradictory versions of the incident. For purposes of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.