In Re Yokoyama

Good Law
170 F. Supp. 467·1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3738
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 195981-59California3,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yankwich, J.

The facts in the case are simple. The petitioner is held at the Lompoc Barracks, Santa Barbara County, California, within the jurisdiction of this court, under the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on July 26,1958 by a court-martial, convened at Camp Zana, Honshu, Japan. At the time, he was a civilian employee of the Armed Forces of the United States. He was charged with appropriating eight military payment certificates of the value of $50 each, was found guilty and ordered committed for four years and to pay a fine of $3,000. The sentence was later reduced by the reviewing authorities to two years and $3,000.

The proceedings in the military court have not become final. But I am of the view that, when a prisoner convicted by court-martial attacks the military tribunal’s jurisdiction, not only over the crime, but over him, no question can be raised as to whether he has exhausted his remedies through military channels. This, for the reason that he challenges the very basis of the court’s jurisdiction. And jurisdiction is the power to hear and ^determine. It is formed from two Latin words — juris and clictio — meaning to pronounce the law.

There is a phrase in an old…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.