Jones

COMMON CAUSE SOUTHERN v. Jones

Good Law
213 F. Supp. 2d 1110
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20022:01-cv-03470California2,656 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephen M. Kristovich, Bradley S. Phillips, Deborah N. Pearlstein, Munger Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, John C. Ulinn, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, Los Angeles, CA, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Daniel P. Tokaji, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Evan H. Caminker, Munger Tolles & Olson, San Francisco, CA, Alan L. Schlosser, ACLU Foundation of Northern Cal., Jordan C. Budd, ACLU Foundation of San Diego & Imperial Counties, Stephen P. Berzon, Jonathan Weissglass, Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain, Jonathan P. Hiatt, Laurence E. Gold, AFL-CIO, for Plaintiffs.

Daniel George Stone, Louis R. Mauro, CAAG—Office of Attorney General of California, Correctional Law Section, Sacramento, CA, Douglas J. Woods, CAAG Office of Attorney General of California, CA, for Defendant.

WILSON, District Judge.

On February 19, 2002, this Court issued an order finding that, based on the uncontroverted evidence in the record, as well as the admission by Defendant at oral argument, it was feasible for the nine California counties currently using the pre-scored punch card voting systems to convert to "other certified voting equipment" by March 2004. Therefore, as that was the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.