Hillery

Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. Hillery

Good Law
658 F. Supp. 2d 1002·2009 WL 2711264·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76244
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2009C-08-4357 EMCCalifornia8,931 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ COUNTER-COMPLAINT; AND FINDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE MOOT

Docket No.

Plaintiff Consumer Solutions REO, LLC (“Consumer Solutions”) initiated this lawsuit against Defendants Ruthie B. Hillery and the Spielbauer Law Firm, seeking, inter alia, a judicial foreclosure and an equitable lien on certain real property owned by Ms. Hillery. On May 27, 2009, Ms. Hillery filed a counter-complaint against Consumer Solutions, Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”). Currently pending before the Court is Consumer Solutions’ motion to dismiss all nine claims asserted in the counter-complaint. Consumer Solutions has also moved to strike certain allegations in the counter-complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f).

Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss. The Court finds the motion to strike moot in view of its conversion to and grant of the motion to dismiss.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.