O'NEAL

O'NEAL v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Good Law
551 F. Supp. 2d 993·2008 WL 275782·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6804
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2008CIV S-06-1063 FCD/DADCalifornia9,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

Damrell, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline’s (“GSK”) motion for summary judgment on the ground plaintiffs Terri O’Neal and Barry Bratt’s (“plaintiffs”) state tort claims are preempted by federal law, ie., the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., and its implementing regulations, because they require warnings that directly conflict with federal law governing the labeling and warnings for Pax-il® (“Paxil”). Plaintiffs bring this action for the wrongful death of their son, Benjamin Bratt (“Benjamin”), who attempted suicide, on February 14,1997, at the age of 13, while being treated with Paxil, an antidepressant medication manufactured and sold by GSK. Benjamin died on February 15, 1997 from injuries sustained from his suicide attempt.

The gravamen of plaintiffs’ claims is that GSK should have provided, at the time of Benjamin’s death, a warning that Paxil is associated with suicidality in pediatric patients. GSK contends, however, that plaintiffs’ state tort claims directly conflict with the FDA’s-mandated labeling for Pax-il in February 1997, and implementation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.