Regen

United States v. Regen

Good Law
551 F. Supp. 2d 963·2008 WL 724096·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23084
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2008CR 01-672 AHMCalifornia2,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Matz, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TERMINATE SUPERVISED RELEASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Defendant Stephen Jeffrey Regen (“Re-gen”) is the subject of a petition filed by the United States Probation Office alleging that Regen has violated the conditions of his supervised release. Regen moves to dismiss the petition and terminate his supervised release on the grounds that the term of his supervision had expired before the issuance of the summons requiring him to show cause why his supervision should not be revoked. Therefore, according to Regen, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the pending petition for revocation of supervision.

For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that it does have jurisdiction and DENIES Regen’s Motion to Terminate Supervision.

FACTS

On September 17, 2001, Regen pled guilty to a four-count indictment charging him with two counts of bankruptcy fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152 (3); one count of impersonating a federal officer or employee, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 912 ; and one count of forging a judge’s signature, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 505 . The indictment also cited 18 U.S.C. § 3147 and alleged that at the time Regen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.