Gardner

Gardner v. Wilson

Good Law
959 F. Supp. 1224·1997 WL 115868
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 1997CV 96-1137-JGD(RC)California3,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ronald Wayne Gardner, Norco, CA, pro se.

Quisteen S. Shum, California Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.

DAVIES, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; and (2) defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing with prejudice the Complaint and action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on the parties.

CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable John G. Davies, District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

On February 15, 1996, plaintiff Ronald W. Gardner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.