Navarro
United States v. Navarro
Opinion
Opinion
Karlton, J.
ORDER
Movant filed the instant suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . He claims that the Special Assistant United States Attorney appearing in the criminal case underlying this litigation was without authority to represent the United States during the relevant period, and accordingly, this court lacked jurisdiction to entertain that prosecution.
The matter was briefed, an evidentiary hearing was held, argument was heard and the matter was taken under submission. It is disposed of herein.
I.
FACTS
At all times relevant herein, Dale Kitching was a Deputy District Attorney in the County of Sacramento, and was Supervisor of that office’s major narcotics unit. Pursuant to those responsibilities, Mr. Kitching became involved in the Sacramento County Sheriffs investigation of the movant. After Navarro’s arrest, Mr. Kitching telephoned Nancy Simpson, then Chief of the Narcotics and Violent Crime Section of the office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California. His purpose was to propose the federal prosecution of the movant.
Ms. Simpson agreed that the case fell within the standards adopted by this district’s United States Attorney for the prosecution of…