National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.

Caution
452 F. Supp. 2d 946·2006 WL 2578282·18 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1148·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63591
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2006C 06-01802 MHPCalifornia9,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Re: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Plaintiffs National Federation of the Blind, National Federation of the Blind of California, Bruce Sexton, and all those similarly situated, filed this action against Target Corporation (“Target”), seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. Plaintiffs claim that Target.com is inaccessible to the blind, and thereby violates federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination against the disabled. Now before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Having considered the parties’ arguments and submissions, and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.

BACKGROUND

Target operates approximately 1,400 retail stores nationwide, including 205 stores in California. Target.com is a website owned and operated by Target. By visiting Target.com, customers can purchase many of the items available in Target stores. Target.com also allows a customer to perform functions related to Target stores. For example, through Target.com, a customer can access information on store locations and hours, refill a prescription…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.