Middlesex Retirement System v. Quest Software Inc.

Good Law
527 F. Supp. 2d 1164·2007 WL 3286784·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84695
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2007CV 06-6863 DOC (RNBx)California16,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.

Before the Court is Defendants Quest Software Inc., Vincent C. Smith, M. Brinkley Morse, Michael J. Lambert, Douglas F. Garn, David M Doyle, Jerry Murdock, Jr., and Kevin Brooks’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“Defendants’ Motion”) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b) and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u, et seq. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for September 10, 2007 was removed from the Court’s calendar. After considering the moving, opposing, and replying papers, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion and DISMISSES the specified portions of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Parties

Plaintiff Middlesex Retirement System (“Plaintiff’) is a Massachusetts pension fund, established on December 2, 1911. Plaintiff is seeking class certification for all those persons or entities who purchased Quest securities (“the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.