Lisker

Lisker v. Knowles

Good Law
651 F. Supp. 2d 1097·2009 WL 2460863·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69086
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 2009Case CV 04-02687 VAP (RZ)California22,582 words

Opinion

Opinion

Phillips, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, records on file, and the Second Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Second Report to which objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the undersigned submits this Second Report and Recommendation to the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge. The undersigned recommends that the Court grant the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as to its second, third, and fourth claims if the State of California does not retry Petitioner. The undersigned recommends that the Second Amended Petition be denied as to its first claim for relief.

I.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On November 21,1985, Petitioner Bruce E. Lisker was convicted of second degree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.