Rutledge

Rutledge v. Riddell

Good Law
186 F. Supp. 552·6 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5423·1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5100
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 1960246/59California3,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

Westover, J.

Plaintiff, Emma Loomis Rutledge, and Vernon E. Rutledge were husband and wife. They were divorced in 1949. At the time of the divorce they were the owners, as joint tenants with right of survivorship, of the property situated in Los Angeles County, California, described as follows:

Lots 4, 5 and 6 of Tract 7659, as per map recorded in Book 83, page 11 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California.

In 1950 plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California, No. 571,717, against Vernon E. Rutledge, her former husband. On May 12, 1954 a judgment was rendered by the Superior Court in favor of Emma Loomis Rutledge and against Vernon E. Rutledge in the sum of $95,-910.95. Execution was obtained by plaintiff in said action and placed in the hands of the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, California, who, on May 13, 1954, levied upon the property and attached all the right, title and interest of Vernon E. Rutledge therein.

■ On May 17, 1954 plaintiff recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, a certified copy of the judgment. The Sheriff of Los Angeles County was making arrangements…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.