Wolfe v. National Lead Company

Good Law
225 F.2d 427
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 195513966_1California3,816 words

Opinion

Opinion

225 F.2d 427 Bernard Mitchell WOLFE and Frederick J. Dannenfelser, Individuals and Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Name and Styles, 'Dutch Paint Co.' and 'Manning-Mitchell Paint Co.,' Appellants, v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, a New Jersey Corporation; E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc., et al., Appellees. No. 13966. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 27, 1955. Rehearing Denied Aug. 22, 1955. Joseph L. Alioto, Maxwell Keith, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. Robert E. Burns, Crimmins, Kent, Draper & Bradley, San Francisco, Cal. (James D. Ewing, Milton Handler, John B. Henrich, Eugene Z. DuBose, Stanley D. Robinson, New York City, of counsel), for appellee Nat. Lead Co. Eugene D. Bennett, Francis R. Kirkham, James Michael, San Francisco, Cal. (James P. Kranz, Jr., New York City, Pillsbury, Madion & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee E. I. du Pont. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. 1 This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a private action brought under the antitrust act, and based upon the claim that appellants suffered damage as the result of appellees'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.