Gulf Insurance v. Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc.

Good Law
388 F. Supp. 2d 1134·2005 WL 1378957·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37305
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 2005Civ. S 03-1351MCEKJMCalifornia1,762 words

Opinion

Opinion

England, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Gulf Insurance Company has asked the Court to grant summary adjudication against Defendant Steve K. Zinnel (“Defendant”) on its claims for express indemnity and breach of contract. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

The present dispute arises out of a general agreement of indemnity (hereinafter the “Indemnity Agreement”) involving Plaintiff and Defendant. The Indemnity Agreement was entered into on July 15, 1996. (Mot. for Summ. J., Ex. B at 1.) According to Plaintiff, the Indemnity Agreement was partially based on Plaintiffs execution of bonds in favor of Defendant. (Mot. for Summ. J. at 4:7-8.)

On January 12, 2000, two third-party subcontractors brought an action against a bond issued on Defendant’s behalf. (Mot. for Summ. J. at 5:13-14.) Plaintiff allegedly incurred $496,024.77 in expenses and losses in settling this third-party lawsuit. (PL’s Mot. for Summ. J. at 8:23-24, 9:12.) Plaintiff claims that by virtue of the Indemnity Agreement, Defendant is liable for the resulting expenses and losses.

On June 25, 2003, Plaintiff brought suit against Defendant for (1) express indemnity, (2) specific performance,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.