Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Lynch

Good Law
216 F. Supp. 2d 1016·2002 WL 1821474·53 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1376·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13895
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2002C-01-3023 VRWCalifornia17,504 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walker, J.

ORDER

By its complaint, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG & E) attacks the regulatory restructuring scheme California developed and later implemented for its electrical public utilities. PG & E names as defendants Loretta M Lynch, Henry M Duque, Carl W Wood, Geoffrey F Brown and Michael R Peevey , in their„ official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). PG & E has moved for summary judgment on its first and second claims for relief (Doc # 111) while defendants have filed cross-motions for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment on PG & E’s preemption claims. Doc # 104. Applicant in intervention The Utility Reform Network (TURN) also moves for summary judgment against PG & E. Doc #119.

I

A

PG & E filed its original complaint against defendants on November 8, 2000, in this court, bringing the same claims as in its present complaint, with the addition of an equal protection claim. See Compl in PG & E v. Lynch, et al, No C-00-4128 (SBA) (NDCal), in PRJN I (Doc # 49, Exh # 3). That action was subsequently transferred to Judge Lew in the Central District of California, who was presiding over a similar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.