Richard Thomas v. United States

Good Law
227 F.2d 667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 195514355_1California2,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fee, J.

Richard Thomas and Walter E. Powell were convicted after a trial before a jury on three counts of an indictment charging violations of 15 U.S.C.A. § 77q(a) (2), which reads:

They were acquitted upon Count 4, which charged conspiracy between these defendants to commit the substantive offenses. Powell does not appeal.

Counts 1 and 2 were based upon the same alleged sale of common stock of Thomascolor, Inc., to Jerome K. George and Myrtle T. George for $3,500.00 by means of untrue statements of material facts known by defendants to be untrue when made and by omissions to state material facts, which representations and omissions are alleged in detail. The difference between these two counts is that, in the first, use of the mails in the consummation of the sale is alleged, and, in the second, use of means and instruments of transportation is set up, in that defendants .caused Powell to travel by commercial airline from Los Angeles to Phoenix.

Count 3 set up a similar sale of securities to Bailey Spencer, with alleged untrue statements of material facts and alleged omissions to state material facts, wherein it was also set up that in this, sale defendants caused Thomas to travel by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.