GE Engine Services UNC Holding I, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.

Good Law
250 F. Supp. 2d 1237·2001 WL 34079568·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25240
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2001CV-01-2551-ERCalifornia2,831 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rafeedie, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with the Defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings, and having heard oral argument by counsel, the Court now reaches the following CONCLUSIONS:

[1] Defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) brings a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). The remaining defendants — Century Indemnity Co. (“Century”), Travelers Indemnity Company (“TIC”), Travelers Casualty And Surety Company (“TCSC” and collectively with TIC, “Travelers”), and Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), as successor in interest to defendant Northbrook Insurance Company (“Northbrook”) — have all filed joinders to the Hartford motion.

BACKGROUND

[2] This is an action for a declaratory judgment and for damages for breach of various insurance contracts. Plaintiff GE Engine Services UNC Holding I, Inc. (“GE Engine”) is the successor in interest to UNC Resources, Inc. (“UNC Resources”) and United Nuclear Corporation (“UNC”). Plaintiff UNC Pacific Armotive Corporation (“Pacific Airmotive”) operates an engine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.