Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Corporation

Good Law
228 F.2d 365
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 195614254_1California4,668 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiig, J.

Pacific Employers Insurance Company (Pacific) appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory relief brought against it by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford). The respective liabilities of the two companies under their policies of insurance because of injuries to one Richard D. Carter presented a controversy within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1332 and 1391.

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Mining Company) entered into written contract with the Wm. P. Neil Company (Neil) whereby Neil was to construct a roofing granules plant on Mining Company property in Riverside County, California. As part of its cost-plus contract, Neil was required to prepare the site for an electric power substation on the property. The substation was to be built by the California Electric Power Company (Electric Company) under a separate agreement with Mining Company. An easement in gross was granted by Mining Company to Electric Company to enter the premises and construct the substation.

The site of the power substation was on a hill which Neil had leveled and on which had been constructed a retaining wall. Neil was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.