United States v. Dagmar S. Cooke, United States of America v. Philip E. Spalding, United States of America v. Sophie Judd Cooke, United States of America v. Muriel Howatt Cooke

Good Law
228 F.2d 667·48 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 789·1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4962
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 195514339-14342_1California2,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

228 F.2d 667 56-1 USTC P 9166 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Dagmar S. COOKE, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Philip E. SPALDING, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Sophie Judd COOKE, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Muriel Howatt COOKE, Appellee. Nos. 14339-14342. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1955. II. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edward W. Rothe, Ellis N. Slack, Hilbert P. Zarky, David O. Walter, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Louis B. Blissard, U.S. Atty., Abbott M. Sellers, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant. Anderson, Wrenn & Jenks, Heaton L. Wrenn, Marshall M. Goodsill, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellees. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and LEMMON, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. 1 The United States appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, holding Mrs. Dagmar Cooke entitled to recover capital gains tax paid by her on the difference in value of 2,000 shares in a corporation, Charles M. Cooke Ltd., when she received them, and the greater value of the property she received on the dissolution and distribution of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.