Astrue

TICH PHAM v. Astrue

Good Law
695 F. Supp. 2d 1027·2010 WL 148206·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6426
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2010EDCV 08-1479-RCCalifornia2,739 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Tich Pham, aka Tich Thi Pham, filed a complaint on October 22, 2008, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for disability benefits. On March 27, 2009, the Commissioner answered the complaint, and the parties filed a joint stipulation on May 6, 2009.

BACKGROUND

On December 3, 2004 (protective filing date), plaintiff filed an application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423 , claiming an inability to work since April 20, 2003, due to “severe radiating pain in left arm, surgery [on her] left arm, pain in [her] right arm, and depression^]” Certified Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 23, 76, 79-80. The plaintiffs application was initially denied on March 22, 2005, and, following reconsideration, was denied again on June 2, 2005. A.R. 59-71. The plaintiff then requested an administrative hearing, which was held before Administrative Law Judge F. Keith Varni (the “ALJ”) on November 30, 2006, and on March 26, 2007. A.R. 72-73, 398-428. On April 10, 2007, the ALJ issued a decision finding plaintiff is not disabled. A.R. 21-30. The plaintiff appealed this decision to the Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.